EN

司法覆核

(English) Basic Law Constitutional Challenges •
Election Petitions

難民法

(English) USM • Non-refoulement •
Convention Against Torture (CAT) • Right to Work

移民法

(English) Dependent & Employment Visas •
Residency & Right Of Abode • Deportation and Removal Order • Chinese Nationality

索償要求

(English) Unlawful Detention • Personal Injury

人口販運

(English) Forced Labour & Exploitation

歧視

(English) LGBTQI2S Rights •
Equal Opportunities • Employment

人權和法治宣傳

(English) Begum Shufia & Sarker MD Salahin & Sarker MD Shahariyar v Torture Claims Appeal Board (CACV 19/2023)

(English) On 9 July 2024, the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the minor applicants in Begum Shufia & Sarker MD Salahin & Sarker MD Shahariyar v Torture Claims Appeal Board (CACV 19/2023), granting leave for the minor applicants to challenge the Torture Claims Appeal Board’s decision on Fabio grounds.

In particular, the Court made it clear that even if the minor applicants were legally represented before the Board, it is still necessary for the Board to consider their claims separately from that of their mother. Failure to do so would give rise to a reasonably arguable ground of judicial review.

We are grateful to have the pro bono assistance of Ms. Samantha Lau of Denis Chang’s Chambers (instructed by our firm).

Click here for the full judgment.

搜尋新聞

標題

日期

Keywords

2023年10月18日

Keywords

2023年7月31日

Keywords

2023年2月10日

Keywords

2022年6月20日

Keywords

2022年6月20日

Keywords

2022年6月15日

Keywords

2021年12月10日
2021年6月07日

(English) RTHK BACKCHAT

Keywords

2021年6月07日

Keywords

2021年3月15日

Keywords

2021年1月08日

Keywords

2020年12月10日

Keywords

2020年9月19日

Keywords

2020年6月24日

Keywords

2015年6月03日

Keywords

2014年3月18日
2013年12月15日

(English) My life: Mark Daly

Keywords

2013年12月15日

Keywords

2013年11月09日

Keywords

2013年7月24日

Keywords

2013年7月16日

Keywords

2012年10月24日

找不到結果

(English) Our website and its contents are provided for general information purposes only and nothing on this website or in its contents is intended to provide legal or other professional advice. We do not accept responsibility for loss which may arise from reliance on information or materials published on this website. If you wish to find out more about the information published, please contact us by email.
For the avoidance of doubt, contents of any other website which may be linked from this website are not maintained or controlled by this firm, and this firm will not be responsible for the content or accuracy thereof. Such Links to other websites do not constitute an endorsement by this firm of such websites or the information or other materials available thereon.

(English) Our website and its contents are provided for general information purposes only and nothing on this website or in its contents is intended to provide legal or other professional advice. We do not accept responsibility for loss which may arise from reliance on information or materials published on this website. If you wish to find out more about the information published, please contact us by email.
For the avoidance of doubt, contents of any other website which may be linked from this website are not maintained or controlled by this firm, and this firm will not be responsible for the content or accuracy thereof. Such Links to other websites do not constitute an endorsement by this firm of such websites or the information or other materials available thereon.